Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

We know the Big Ten is formally announcing the division splits tonight but ESPN is reporting those divisions this afternoon. According to their sources, the teams will be divided as follows:

1 - OSU, PSU, Indiana, Purdue, Illinois, Wisconsin
2 - Michigan, MSU, NW, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska

So it's basically an east/west split with the two Michigan schools switching sides with Wisconsin and Illinois. ESPN also says they will use those division for basketball as well, and play a 16-game schedule with each team playing two games within their division and one game across divisions. There is no word on whether or not OSU-MIchigan will remain at the end of the season.

over 1 year ago Jared_sullinger--300x450_tiny Buckeye Brad 20 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The Big Ten has sacrificed its tradition for the possibility to become the SEC.

by Tyler T. on Sep 1, 2010 2:48 PM EDT reply actions  

What do you mean by that? Are you talking about moving OSU-Michigan from the last game of the season — because that’s not necessarily going to happen just because they’re in opposite divisions — or do you have other problems with these divisions?

. . . says the man from Columbus.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 1, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am assuming that the placementThe Game will be moved, which may be premature, but appears likely at this point.

by Tyler T. on Sep 1, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Putting OSU and That School Up North in separate divisions

Assures they are moving The Game up in the schedule. No one wants to see The Game played on consecutive weeks.

It's a good day to be a Pirate

by Bucko on Sep 1, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

It may indicate that, but in the past twenty years, only 6 times would there have been a rematch (06, 03, 01, 98, 97, and 92.) That’s still a meaningful amount of rematches, but with the addition of Nebraska to the conference, the league probably expects that number to go down over a similar period of time.

by Tyler T. on Sep 1, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, it’s not assured at all. I think the public outcry over the past couple weeks convinced Delany and the AD’s to keep The Game where it is.

. . . says the man from Columbus.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 1, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s sad to see the tradition go, but I think this is a good move in the long run. 50 years from now, I don’t think people will look back at this move as a mistake, but I could be wrong.

Anderception [an·der·cep·tion] -noun
1. the logical end result of a Derek Anderson pass

by Simmsinns on Sep 1, 2010 3:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Disgraceful.

GIVE ME A BLUE JACKETS TEAM WORTH ROOTING FOR

by joshjoshjosh on Sep 1, 2010 3:18 PM EDT reply actions  

If they keep The Game at the end of the year, I have no problem with these divisions. I would love to see back-to-back OSU vs TSUN games. The only real problem I have is what are we going to name the divisions? Im all for Woody Division vs Bo Division….I guess thats a little bias though

by jharbdo on Sep 1, 2010 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

If The Game is preserved, then they have done a fantastic job with this alignment. If not, then Gene Smith, E. Gordon Gee, David Brandon, and Mary Sue Coleman have failed miserably.

by Tyler T. on Sep 1, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

So this changes….nothing? We still play Michigan, and I don’t see how/why that game wouldn’t be the last regular season game. The big change will be the addition of a championship game.

The divisions seem pretty even. I guess there’s 3 habitual cupcakes (unless you want to count Illinois), and we ended up with just 1 in our division, but no big deal.

by dgcambridge on Sep 1, 2010 4:52 PM EDT reply actions  

There have been indications that the conference has seriously considered changing The Game‘s date. We shall find out soon enough if that’s true.

by Tyler T. on Sep 1, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Competitively I do think these divisions are nice, but it does seem as if they may move The Game up a bit (which I don’t like) or have the possibility of the teams meeting in back to back weeks (which I don’t like either).

Unfortunately from my point of view any scenario that split up OSU and Mich was bound to be a failure.

by nhayhoe on Sep 1, 2010 5:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, anyway you slice it, divisions or not, a Big 10 championship game is going to take away from The Game. I think it’s worth it.

by dgcambridge on Sep 1, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

http://twitter.com/deryNBA/status/22725671003

It’s a rumor, but has some legits to it.

Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!

by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Sep 1, 2010 5:39 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s been said elsewhere, but this is a terrible alignment for hoops. As such I’m inclined to believe that this is a football only set-up (which has also been said/suggested/rumored elsewhere).

And if Karsch’s info is correct (what Ian linked), then this is better than what I expected them to do. I’d still have preferred OSU and UM in the same division (particularly if PSU’s protected cross-divisional rival ends up being Nebraska), but it’s the best of a bad situation.

by Estrada on Sep 1, 2010 5:58 PM EDT reply actions  

It doesn't really matter as much for basketball.

because there is a conference tournament, and playing a tougher schedule isn’t necessarily as bad because that is taken into consideration into RPI.

by golfballs03 on Sep 1, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

However, it matters in basketball for two reasons: 1) conference tournament seeding and 2) playing two games against in-division foes will affect strength of schedule and therefore RPI.

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Sep 2, 2010 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess it depends on how they do the seeding

the SEC way of doing it is terrible. I think the Big 12 does seeding irrespective of divisions.

As for the RPI, it will make a difference, but those get taken into consideration if you are vying for an at large. In football, if you are stuck in a brutal division, it still only takes a loss to seriously damage title hopes. Thats why I said it doesn’t matter as much for basketball

by golfballs03 on Sep 2, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Certainly right now, the division with Ohio State, Illinois, Wisconsin and Purdue is a whole lot tougher basketball than the other division. That’s going to be reflected in conference record. Sure looks like Michigan State pretty much has a cakewalk in the other division. The only fair way of seeding the conference tourney is across divisions like the SEC does it.

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Sep 3, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Ohio St. Buckeyes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Topps1978-332f_small
Best OSU squads over the past 16 seasons
Small
LARDASSIO'S LOSERS 2011-12 BOWL EXTRAVAGANZA............
Byu_flag_small
2012 Buckeye Football "Speculation"
Hugh_griffith_small
Oversigning Update: To The Cheaters Belong The Bowls
Small
New Year, Same B1G Story...
289831_2250736828549_1252090666_2652129_3577112_o-1_small
Buckeye Recruit Hoot: Meyer's Staff Check Up on 2013 Prospects, Welcome in
Small
SDSU's Strength Coach to OSU?
Small
63 + 25 = 82, 25 + 2 = 25 ... Recruiting Math Rules
Small
Buckeye Offensive Roster Talent
Small
Buckeye Defensive Roster Talent

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small Tyler T.

Ohio-state-sportsmedia_small Ross Fulton

Editors

Tr_logo_ohio_180_wide_small Smith1

Kyle_lamb_pro_small KyleSLamb