Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Will Rhymes 'Fine' After Being Hit By Pitch And Fainting

Ohio State Completes One Pass, Defeats Illinois

Photo

Midway through the second quarter, offensive coordinator Jim Bollman called Ohio State's first pass play. It was an incompletion. Two quarters later, Bollman returned to the air and Braxton Miller completed his first and only pass in the game, a 17-yard touchdown to tight end Jake Stoneburner.

Stoneburner's touchdown, which Illini receiver A.J. Jenkins set up by fumbling near his own 28-yard line three plays earlier, gave Ohio State a 17-0 lead over Illinois with thirteen minutes left. Despite some late game hijinks and a return to Bollman ball, the Silver Bullet defense held the lead and secured a 17-7 Buckeye victory.

The late aerial assault notwithstanding, Ohio State's offense regressed to the Michigan State gameplan of two weekends ago. The Buckeye's 10-play opening drive ended in a 43-yard field goal, but it was the only score before halftime. Illinois' offensive troubles allowed Bollman to turtle up and revert to his tendencies, two tailback runs and then a QB draw on third down. At halftime, both Illinois and Ohio State were averaging less than four yards per play.

Illini quarterback Nathan Scheelhaase, who ranked among the Big Ten's best before the game, struggled. Scheelhaase (58%, 5 YPA) threw two devastating interceptions, one of which came on Illinois' second play of the second half. A.J. Jenkins ran a curl route, Scheelhaase badly overthrew him, and Buckeye cornerback Bradley Roby picked the pass and returned it to the Illini 12-yard line.

Dan "Boom" Herron, in his first game back from a 6-game suspension, bounced the next play outside and strolled into the endzone for a 10-0 lead.

Star-divide

It's not hyperbole to say that Bollman called three different plays for 75-percent of Ohio State's snaps, perhaps even more. On standard downs, sprint-draws and Iso runs dominated the scene, followed by a QB Draw on third-and-medium. It's a testament to Herron and Jordan Hall, who gained 56 yards on 12 carries, that they found any success running the ball against stacked fronts.

Stat Ohio State Illinois
First Downs 14 18
Total Yards 228 285
Rushing Yards 211 116
Passing Yards 17 169
Plays 55 69
Yards Per Play 4.1 4.1
Points 17 7

Indeed, Herron's return keyed the meager offensive showing. On 23 carries, he gained 114 yards running mostly from the I-formation. Herron's hop-skip juke move left Illini defenders grabbing at ankles and air. In fact, Ohio State's best plays weren't necessarily due to design, but rather to Herron's slippery, tenacious running style. When there appeared to be a stalemate at the line-of-scrimmage, Herron would often scoot out and find his own lane.

No one should be fooled by today's outcome. If it weren't for the turnovers, Ohio State never would have scored a touchdown. Any play-calling improvement is a mirage. Illinois' front seven, sixty pounds lighter than Michigan State's, had trouble matching the Buckeye offensive line pound-for-pound, even with a numbers advantage, and that made the slight difference. Ohio State could run against Illinois when everyone knew it was coming, and they could not do so against the Spartans.

With his unwillingness to call any companion plays-- like a sprint-draw pass, QB bootleg, or vertical play-action-- Jim Bollman has morphed into a parody of himself. He's made the offensive line and running backs work harder than they should, and he's relegated the receivers to meaningless decoys.

In a season lacking high aspirations, improvement and progress should be the two primary goals. Although we won today, what growth did Braxton Miller experience? What lesson did he learn, what skills did he hone? None, none, and none. No victory is empty, but this one is leaking fluid.

The Defense Returns

Following last weekend's second-half implosion, it seemed uncertain what defense we would see today, especially with middle linebacker Storm Klein's health in question. Klein played, however, and the Buckeye defense returned, stifling an Illini scoring offense ranked 4th in the Big Ten.

Defensive coordinator Jim Heacock and Fickell crafted a strong gameplan that limited big plays while pressuring the run game. Before today, Illinois had the 15th most plays of 20+ yards nationally, most of which came from the Scheelhaase-to-Jenkins connection. Jenkins caught eight passes for 80 yards, but was held to only one 20+ yard catch, and the Illini only averaged 3.3 yards per carry.

Defensive lineman Johnny Simon had another fine individual day. Heacock moved Simon along the line, sometimes blitzing him, sometimes dropping him into coverage, and often letting him play his gap and just make plays. Beyond any doubt, Simon has developed into Ohio State's best defensive player. His disruptive presence proved more than the Illini could block.

Klein, Tyler Moeller, and Andrew Sweat, the linebackers who struggled against Nebraska, played well against the slower Illinois offense. Instead of starting Etienne Sabino, Heacock elected to run a 4-2-5 set with Moeller at the STAR position. It was a good choice. Sabino's size will matter against Wisconsin two weekends from now, but his lumbering gait remains a hindrance. Whenever it's possible to replace him with Moeller, it is a good idea to do so.

Next Up: No game next weekend; Wisconsin two weekends from now.

Poll
Who had more to do with Ohio State's meager offensive success, Jim Bollman or Boom Herron?
Jim Bollman
10 votes
Dan Herron
68 votes

78 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Few things..

First.. Boom will be a solid pro prospect and I think he’ll be a steal in the mid rounds.

Second.. the offense, more aptly Jim Bollman, was repeatedly bailed out by the defense. This team came out swinging against Nebraska and then tore the pages from the playbook against a much weaker Illinois team. Yes there was wind to account for, and yes you figure Bollman and Fickell want to play Tressel’s brand of ball control, but you’ve got to get the pass going in any game. This win is an aberration and a reflection of our amazing defense.

Second.. the offense, more aptly Jim Bollman, was repeatedly bailed out by the defense. This team came out swinging against Nebraska and then tore the pages from the playbook against a much weaker Illinois team. Yes there was wind to account for, and yes you figure Bollman and Fickell want to play Tressel’s brand of ball control, but you’ve got to get the pass going in any game. This win is an aberration and a reflection of our amazing defense.I’m very curious to see what the plan is against Wisconsin. I think Bollman needs to look at how Oregon runs the option. We are now 7 games in and this offensive coaching staff clearly has no idea what gameplan to install during the week. you can’t just be running draws and Isos all week, can you? I know that there was talk of Miller being unable to properly plant his back foot for a throw but he has two weeks to get into passing form and I hope it’s enough.

Second.. the offense, more aptly Jim Bollman, was repeatedly bailed out by the defense. This team came out swinging against Nebraska and then tore the pages from the playbook against a much weaker Illinois team. Yes there was wind to account for, and yes you figure Bollman and Fickell want to play Tressel’s brand of ball control, but you’ve got to get the pass going in any game. This win is an aberration and a reflection of our amazing defense.I’m very curious to see what the plan is against Wisconsin. I think Bollman needs to look at how Oregon runs the option. We are now 7 games in and this offensive coaching staff clearly has no idea what gameplan to install during the week. you can’t just be running draws and Isos all week, can you? I know that there was talk of Miller being unable to properly plant his back foot for a throw but he has two weeks to get into passing form and I hope it’s enough.Great win. Go Bucks. I hope they are ready for Wisconsin because Christ if I’ve ever been afraid of those chumps.

by Cry on Oct 15, 2011 10:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Why one paragraph was doubled, I’ve no clue. I certainly didn’t copy paste it and I doubt I could retype it, without noticing, with such accuracy. :o

by Cry on Oct 15, 2011 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it possible to gain confidence while throwing 4 passes for an entire game? Can Braxton feel better? Heard Hyde tweeted some sour grapes after the game too.

by biggy84 on Oct 15, 2011 11:08 PM EDT reply actions  

On the upside...

…the chances of being bowl eligible looks good.

It will be a lousy bowl, but just getting to a bowl will allow the new HC a chance to see his new team and coaching staff candidates in practice, and will allow the underclassmen another 1+ months of practice.

Don;t erase Luke’s name from the payroll just yet
1. Luke is an interim, it wouldn’t be a big deal to the players, recruits, or staff to slide him back in as co-defensive coordinator – they don’t even have to fire him.
2. There isn’t going to be a lot of calls to Luke to become HC someplace else.
3. I doubt it would make sense for him to become DC someplace else if the new HC is interested.
4. Heacock is no spring pup – it wouldn’t be advisable to any coach to make him the sole DC unless there is a developing alternate in the wings.
5. While nothing would be as dumb as keeping Bollman, canning the defensive staff would be close.

by ProveIt on Oct 16, 2011 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

They cannot have the previous head coach on the same staff as the new head coach. Fickell will be a defensive coordinator or head coach elsewhere next season.

by Tyler T. on Oct 16, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

That makes for a nice absolute statement...

…but it runs low on fact.

It wouldn’t be an issue for the coaches. They knew Luke was an interim who was pushed into a full time head coach.
It wouldn’t an issue for the players – they realize the same thing as the coaches.
It wouldn’t an issue for recruiting.
It won’t be an issue for the fans.

The decision ultimately lies with the new HC, but this isn’t the typical HC replacement – Luke has never been more than an interim.

by ProveIt on Oct 16, 2011 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s nice to see a coach who knows less of whats going on than Fickell, Im looking at you Ron Zook

by Dammit Cerrato... on Oct 16, 2011 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Thats like being the smartest kid with Downs Syndrome.

by jonnyphoenix on Oct 16, 2011 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

My question is what does OSU learn from this win? THat they can knock around an undersized DL? I thought they’d have known that. It’ll come in handy against Indiana and PUrdue, but how did they get better prepared for Wisconsin, Penn State, and Michigan (who, in fairness, could probably be knocked around)?

Most concerning on offense is, as Tyler points out, the lack of constraint plays, and perhaps worse, the lack of the threat of constraint plays.

Why teams are continuing to play this offense honest need to take a page from the MSU (and Nebraska’s 2nd half) game tape and blitz, blitz, blitz. THe offense hasn’t showed the ability to beat it yet.

Hats’s off to the D. Really dominated that game. ON Illinois’ scoring drive, the DL pressured the QB, who made plays outside the pocket.

by rogerja on Oct 16, 2011 8:27 AM EDT reply actions  

The bottom line is there’s nothing really different from the coaches game to game…its pretty much all the same. The coaches are just gonna keep doing the same gameplans over and over, and if they are against weaker competition physically, the defense plays really well, or the opponent plays poorly…they have a chance to win. Those are the options the coaches are hoping for looking forward, but they are not trying to affect any real change in what their team is doing. I think they believe they can’t, based on who they’re trotting out there….which I most assuredly disagree with.

by jonnyphoenix on Oct 16, 2011 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

If we had a coaching staff with half a brain we would be undefeated right now.

Seriously, how the hell do some of these coaches get jobs? It all boils down to putting your personnel in a position to succeed. Tailor your play calling to the strengths of your players. You cannot throw 4 passes in the whole game. Spread it out and let Miller throw the ball around the yard. That is the only way he is going to learn. We are not going to win the B1G this year. I think the defense realizes they are going to be on the field 2/3 of the game anyway. What have we got to lose?

by D-Day77 on Oct 17, 2011 12:07 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Ohio St. Buckeyes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lzprofilepictwopointoh_small
Jared Sullinger's Ohio State Legacy: The Burden of False Expectations
Small
Urban's "Percy" this year is.....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small Tyler T.

Ohio-state-sportsmedia_small Ross Fulton

Editors

Tr_logo_ohio_180_wide_small Smith1

Kyle_lamb_pro_small KyleSLamb