Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Upon Further Review: Bo Knows Longreads

Analysis of the Enemy: Denard Robinson's New Offense

Spring Game Offense With Denard Robinson
Personnel (Backs, Bigs)
# Formation #
21 11 I-Form Bal. 11
02 2 Ace 2
22 1 I-Form Bal., Heavy
1
20 3 Shot., Pro 3
12 1 Ace 1
11 11 Shot., Field 7
Shot., Trips Bunch 2
Ace 2
10 3 Shot, Trips Field 3
Total Groupings Total Plays Total Formations
7
32 9

Ohio State's tumultuous offseason created many compelling storylines for the Big Ten, but it has also overshadowed some preexisting points of interest, like Brady Hoke's new regime at Michigan.

With two new coordinators and entirely new schemes on both sides of the ball, the 2011 Wolverines will look much different than the 2010 version, in style if not performance.

New offensive coordinator Al Borges brings a West Coast structure with him from San Diego State, where his offense ranked well nationally in 2010, placing 16th in total offense and 29th in scoring.

Borges, an experienced coach who found success with Cade McNown at UCLA in the '90s and Jason Campbell at Auburn in the mid-2000s, has plans to make the offense "fit" for Denard Robinson, a general statement that doesn't provide much clarity to anyone looking for specific answers.

Michigan's movement away from Rich Rodriguez's spread-to-run system is assured, however, and the end result, if Borges' past and Michigan's spring game is to be trusted, will be a pseudo-West Coast offense with more designed quarterback runs than the system is traditionally known for.

By my count, Denard Robinson received 32 snaps in the Michigan spring game, including a few plays nullified by penalties.  Seventeen snaps came from under center (53%) and 29 included at least two non-receivers (91%), a stunning reversal from a year ago. With Robinson at quarterback, Borges used seven different personnel groupings and roughly nine different formations, five of which placed Robinson under center. The I-formation, which retreated into some hidden burrow at Rodriguez's hiring, has returned as the star of Borges' multiple offense. Twelve plays, the most of any single formation, were run from the I, no doubt causing a wide smile to break on Bo Schembechler's presumably angelic face.

More than anything, the Michigan offense under Lloyd Carr appears back structurally. Multiple backs, bigs, and formations indicate a return to the pro-style scheme Carr's Wolverines exhibited throughout his tenure. There will be important differences in the actual plays-- likely more 3 and 5-step passing-- but the deployment of players and formations will resemble the stereotype of a Michigan offense.

Star-divide

Quarterbacks always receive the most attention when offensive systems change, but offensive lines can struggle with style changes just as much. When Rich Rodriguez arrived, he stressed mobility and conditioning above raw strength in switching the Wolverine offensive line to a no-huddle, purely zone-blocking scheme. Stories leaked from Ann Arbor of offensive linemen struggling to adapt to the frenetic pace, and the 2008 Michigan offense failed to do anything positive, in part due to the offensive line.

After viewing Michigan's spring game, I think the offensive line's transition will be much easier this time around. Borges appears to be maintaining the zone-blocking structure of the rushing offense while adding a bit more man-blocking, mostly in the form of pulling guards and power runs. Ditching the no-huddle pace may take some adjustment, but it's easier to slow down than speed up.

It's a misnomer, too, that zone-blocking is reserved for spread teams or small linemen. Wisconsin, who had perhaps the best and biggest offensive line in college football last season, runs a scheme dependent on zone-blocking. In 2006, Lloyd Carr moved the Michigan offensive line to a primarily zone-blocking one, so what we see from Borges seems in line with the latter Carr years. If anything, the offensive line should be the strength of the Michigan offense in 2011.

Following the scrimmage, Borges said that 60% of the Michigan offense had been installed during the spring and 40% was on display. He stressed balance, versatility, and progress, and mentioned their focus on developing Denard Robinson as a total quarterback, not just an athlete running. Borges' intentions may be admirable, but I see nothing but struggle in Robinson's future as a quarterback in this retooled system.

To be brief, Robinson was awful in the spring game. Other than a a 55-yard run on a quarterback draw taken from the Rodriguez playbook, he struggled. 5-of-14 passing, 70 yards, a few fumbled snaps, and an awkwardness that looked entirely different from his 2010, Superman-esque form. Granted, it was a spring game and 32 snaps is a limited sample size, but the depth of Robinson's struggles leaves no doubt that the 2011 Michigan offense will be much worse than the 2010, record-setting version.

If Robinson significantly improves as a passer, these observations will be silly in retrospect, but I'm not sure he can.  Urban Meyer, who ran a slightly different spread-to-run at Florida, recruited Robinson as a defensive back for a reason. While Robinson would have certainly fared better in Meyer's offense than the woeful John Brantley, his passing skills are still rough enough to warrant questioning.

Everything within Rodriguez's spread-to-run, no-huddle system is a read by the quarterback, or a byproduct of a read. When the system works, it really works, and not just in production. A perfect Rodriguez offense, invariably orchestrated by an agile quarterback, has a quality to it that other offenses lack, a certain flow that determines the pace and temperature of a game. Last season's Michigan offense had too much variation to be considered perfect, but it found the perfect quarterback in Denard Robinson.

Robinson's impressive passing efficiency last season, I think, can be attributed more to the Rodriguez system than any inherent passing ability, a system with built-in routes designed to work with Robinson's lightning legs. When the slot receiver slipped behind a safety peeking into the backfield, it was an easy touchdown throw made possible by the system and Robinson's quicks. The flow isn't there anymore, and the designed quarterback runs now seem artificial and forced.

In the long-term, I think Al Borges will find success at Michigan. He already has a commitment from 2013 quarterback Shane Morris, a big, left-handed, pro-style passer who lit up every camp he attended in the offseason. The future of Michigan football looks a lot like the past, which will make many Michigan fans happy, but it may swallow up Denard Robinson's career in the process.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good write up

It seems that slowing down their offense will be itself a downgrade in DR’s effectiveness. While certainly still capable of ripping big runs, many of his 15+ from last year were predicated on the defense being off balance which at a huddle pace, I just don’t see as much. I wonder also how his reads will come along this year by the time The Game rolls around. He seemed confused and/or fuzzy on making his second read and beyond, making most of his mistakes after the first. Again, without the off-balance D that the spread creates, I see less opportunities to be throwing at the #1 route and/or more mistakes while doing it. They will be a very interesting team to see progress in the Borges offense but at the end of the day, if their D can’t create some sort of resistance, they are stuck in 7-5/8-4 land.

by Onestatewest on Aug 30, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Appreciate and enjoy your work, Tyler. Do you think we’ll see a lot of PA rollouts with Robinson having a run/pass option off of that ZB running game? That would seem to be a place where Robinson’s running ability would/could fit within this new offense.

They could run crack toss/pin and pull off of WR motion and then turn that into a crossing route, or I/S zone with a FB/TE coming across the formation to get the EMOLS and then turn that into something into the flat.

I am really not all that afraid of Robinson if he has to be an efficient dropback passer who can then run.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Aug 30, 2011 3:40 PM EDT reply actions  

The PA rollouts would seem the perfect compliment to their base run game, and I agree, that’s where he could do damage.

by Tyler T. on Aug 30, 2011 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

also be on the lookout for some veer option. Somebody pulled out some video of it during Borges time at Auburn.

by rogerja on Aug 31, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

This could be effective too, but he’s got to put in constraint plays based off of it. If every time Robinson takes the snap from under center and begins that sequence it ends with a veer/triple option, it won’t be too effective. Trying to run an option system and a west-coast system at the same time is trying to do too much IMO.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Aug 31, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Off topic alert

I was wondering how you guys felt that the best of Miami’s players will be suspended just 1 game, in time for them to come back to play Ohio State. While you guys still have 4 guys sitting out, and Terrell Pryor gone, for in my opinion lesser infractions?

To me this is crazy, I expect you to handle Miami easily, but I see no fairness in that.

by Huskerlax on Aug 30, 2011 11:13 PM EDT reply actions  

To me it feels like the NCAA process is very, very long, and we won’t know the real punishment for that program for a while.

If Shapiro really was allowed to run free like that, the program deserves a bigtime punishment. But I don’t remember the article mentioning current players and the benefits they specifically got. It’s not fair to punish them for the actions of former players.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Aug 31, 2011 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that more punishment is probably on the way. But the players in addition have to refund money, my guess is that is not a made up number, but actually something that they can at least mostly prove they received.

by Huskerlax on Aug 31, 2011 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is probably true. How much do the 1-game people have to pay back? We did have a guy suspended for only one game as well.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Aug 31, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Ohio St. Buckeyes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lzprofilepictwopointoh_small
Jared Sullinger's Ohio State Legacy: The Burden of False Expectations

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Recent Posts


Managers

Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small Tyler T.

Ohio-state-sportsmedia_small Ross Fulton

Editors

Tr_logo_ohio_180_wide_small Smith1

Kyle_lamb_pro_small KyleSLamb